Huff. I don't like people.

So I found this website claiming that over population wasn't a thing and that things would always be happy and good. And when I saw there was a comment ability I kinda went mad and wrote this. 

Enjoy. 

If you think that there will never be overpopulation than you could not be farther from the truth. 

You say that you could fit everyone in Texas, and sure you could. But then for anyone to be able to work they would have to get in a plane and travel somewhere hundred maybe thousands away to be able to work. The analogy is completely useless and there is no reason to even bring it up. 

Next if you think overpopulation isn't a thing than you are telling me that infinite people could live on earth. Because that can't happen. Now that's an extreme but in truth the earth could support even a comparatively small number like 100 billion. As of writing this there are 7.148 billion people here.  And right now it hasn't gotten so bad that the population has started to decrease, no I fact it is growing faster now than ever. If you look at a world population over time, we all know it's exponential but really look at it, an you will see that 100 years ago the world population wasn't even two billion. That means that the population growth over all of human history up till that point was amost two billion (1.8). And since than, in one hundred year we have more than tripled it. Some people have it good, namely in the west, so why on earth would they give it up. People are incredibly mean to each other, so what you are talking about is a utopia, and even if we could all be perfect we would still eventually have to large a population to support it be it in five years, fifty years a hundred or a thousand it would eventually happen unless we leave the planet but that's another conversation. Really you have less to worry about than it getting to crowded and more about being killed in war or dehydration, starvation, addiction or something else stupid. So your argument that it isn't true is wrong. Simply look at India or China. There are to many people there. He'll forget about Texas realistically ever one could live in America and it would work. But we would have to get rid of the 'natural' parts of this country which I personally wouldn't care at all, but others would and you would have to go through hell changing their minds or forcing it through. Then come the problems or rounding up everyone and movin them here. And figuring out how you would feed them all. And provide everything from housing and clothing to giving them water and disposing of their waste. 

It would actually be a lot better to split the population into say populations of one billion each and movin to one place and setting up there. That would work for a bit, especially if each group worked one one thing more than others and than traded. But alas something like that just wouldn't happen if you looked at the technicalities. 

So you're wrong, over population is a thing, but it's not because we are running out of things or space (don't get me wrong, that will happen too at some point, just not yet.) but because things aren't perfect and people don't want to share. 

this is a review for the movie The frankenstein Theory

This movie is as some other reviews have said, is alright, neither great nor bad.
i would recommend watching this movie if you have nothing else to do and you want to see a movie that tries to use real facts and insert them into a plot. And for that matter it actually does a relatively good job. On the other hand the guy that is supposed to be a scientist does a lot of stupid things.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The following contains spoilers, you have been warned.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I know that this is supposed to end badly for the people and it is under horror so that is understandable, but based on the way the film ends it would have been alright for the movie to end without all of the dying. And i know that at the end we are not totally sure is the girl is dead or not. but that said it is reasonable to assume she is never heard from again.
Now the scientist tries to 'talk' to the monster, however they could have and should have just all gone and greeted him when he was at the hut and it was day time.
had they done this and one of them not been hiding in the hut then it is very very likely that it would have turned out better for all of the members. Another thing that would have helped them is had they removed a lot of their clothing then it would have made the monster feel more at ease.
think about your dog. when you show them someone new and that person is covered up and semi hidden then the dog is much more likely to bark. but if the person is not hiding anything and showing the dog what is there then it is less likely to bark. this is the same for the monster, if he had not left the girl in there and told her not to make noise, and instead told her to come with him and just stand back and not do anything then it is very very reasonable to assume that it would have worked out. OR it would show that the monster didn't have intelligence and instead was a mindless killer. I like to believe that it would have worked out in their favor had they done this.
Another thing is it was soooo easy for them to find the creature. Though it could be said that the monster found them, this also leads to the assumption that it had some form of intelligence.
Over all i think that they wanted all of the people to die and built around that rather than try to make the story end how it really feels how it should end.
that is why it is meh rather then good or better.